STATISTIK FRÅN |
JORDBRUKSVERKET | |||
Statistikrapport 2016:02 | |||
Jordbruksverkets sockerstatistik |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In English
Summary
If you would like to download the
publication in PDF format, then please click on the link “Första sidan – I
korta drag” above, then click on the link “Hela publikationen (PDF)”. The Swedish
Board of Agriculture and its predecessors have been producing sugar consumption
statistics since the middle of the 1930’s in order to track sugar production
and consumption for strategic and policy reasons. The statistics have also
attracted attention from a health perspective, as sugar consumption is commonly
considered a factor in the development of a multitude of health problems. Our
sugar consumption statistics are however associated with several problems which
limit its usefulness. In this report we give an overview of the methods we
employ in order to produce our sugar consumption statistics – as presented in
the publication “Food Consumption and Nutritive Values” – while also describing
its contents and the pitfalls to avoid when analysing it. Our
statistics over total sugar consumption include the Swedish utilization of
loose sugar and sugar added to
processed foodstuff, but excludes inherent sugar in natural products and their
derivatives, such as fruit, berries, juices and jams. The included sugar types
differ somewhat over time, but for the statistics covering 1995 and later,
sucrose, fructose, glucose, maltose and maltodextrin are included, regardless
of origin or manufacturing process. Considering
the limitations of our statistics, it’s important to keep a few things in mind
during analyses: Interpret the data with caution. For methodological reasons, the
data we present are likely to be overestimates of the true sugar consumption. Avoid year-to-year comparisons. The time resolution of the
statistics is not high enough to accurately distinguish the consumption between
succeeding years. Use caution when comparing results from
different studies.
Different studies employ different methods and have different coverage, making
direct comparisons hazardous. Consider that the conditions for compiling the
statistics have changed over time. As the methods have changed over time, this has not been corrected for in the presented statistics. Thus, proceed
cautiously when comparing data from different periods. Important breaks in the
time series are 1960 and 1995. List of tables
1. Bulk sugar products in the consumption statistics 2. Sugar content factors used for processed foodstuff |